Can COVID-19 Symptoms Come Back After Using Paxlovid? 


What to know about “rebound” in COVID symptoms after taking Paxlovid

The first case of COVID-19 was reported in January 2020. Since then, there have been many more cases. In March 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that there were over 1 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States. As of April 13, 2020, there were over 5.5 million confirmed cases of COVD-19 worldwide.

After taking Paxlivod, the patient’s symptoms went away within 2 days but then came back 4 days later.

The CDC is currently researching how to study the cases. The NIH is actively discussing ways to research the cases.

While the number of people who take Paxil may be small, the number of people who experience side effects is much larger. This includes the possibility of death.

In the case of Paxlivid, the company’s executive pointed out that the drug was not effective enough to make it worth the risk. The drug was not effective enough for patients to get better after taking it. There were also problems with the drug causing side effects.

FDA says “no evidence” taking more Paxlovid helps

There is no evidence that taking more pills of the drug Paxlivod will help patients who see an outbreak of the disease. Top executives at Pfizer say patients who finish off the five-day course of the drugs should be allowed to start another round.

In some cases, there is indeed a rebound effect. This is why the label speaks about a second treatment that can be provided. Doctors have been told by Pfizer as well as the FDA that they can provide a second round of pills.

In other words, the within 5 days symptom clock starts over with relapse. This would be justifiable clinically for our highest risk patients (severely immuncompromised, medically fragile or with severe recurrent symptoms). Favored over other outpatient treatments (which have logistical or efficacy issues).

There are no limitations on prescribing this drug for treatment of subsequent COVID-19 infections in eligible patients. Doctors caution that even the theoretical arguments for an additional course remain tenuous. A second round of pills is also not without its downsides including side effects such as nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, insomnia, fatigue, muscle pain, confusion, hallucinations, agitation, anxiety, and depression.

There are no known side effects associated with Paxlovid. However, there are some concerns about possible interactions with other drugs. Patients should be aware of this potential problem before starting Paxlovid.

The second course of vaccination does not help prevent infection or illness. There is no evidence that the second dose helps protect against the more dangerous Delta strain.

The FDA said that in the clinical trial most patients who began to tested positive again after finishing their first round of pills were asympotomatic, and were not likely to be hospitalised or die from the disease. Late last month, Pfizier disclosed that another recent trial trying to see if its drug can prevent infections after exposure failed tesitical significance.

The vaccine is safe and effective for most people who receive it. However, some people may be more susceptible to side effects or complications after receiving the vaccine.

In order to reduce the risk of severe disease and death, Paxlivod is authorized by the FDA. There is no data at this time that supports a general change in clinical practice.

Dr. Gulick, who serves as co-chair of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) committee responsible for developing recommendations for treating patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, says the panel is “responsive” to concerns over the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, two drugs touted by President Donald Trump as potential treatments for the disease. But he also noted that the guidelines are based on evidence and that the panel doesn’t want to be seen as endorsing any particular treatment regimen.

For now, Gulick acknowledged the uncomfortable position of helping patients decide whether to take another round in the face of a flood of unanswered questions about the effectiveness of the drug. He said they decided not to use a second round of the drug because it had failed before.

The patient, who was vaccinated but not boosted, was over 65 — the age group at highest-risk of severe disease — and had several underlying conditions, including diabetes. Continuing Paxlivid would have meant the patient would need to keep delaying the needed cholesterol medication, Gulicksaid. “The patient fully recovred, a happy person.That’s about as anecdotal asit gets,” he said.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here